![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 30, 1981 |
Friday the 13th Part 2 was my first Friday the 13th movie and thus is something of a personal favorite of mine, warts and all.
Just the ramblings, observations, opinions, memories, and memorabilia of a Gen X Horror Geek.
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 30, 1981 |
Friday the 13th Part 2 was my first Friday the 13th movie and thus is something of a personal favorite of mine, warts and all.
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1500, Day 2 |
Alan Coombs steps off the bus from downtown and out into a cold winter’s night awash with stinging flurries of snow. Waiting for him amongst the others at the stop is a young boy, maybe twelve, with sandy hair, a slight frame, and a narrow freckled face.
“Hi, Dad.” The boy says to Alan. “I came to meet you. Surprised?”
Without realizing he is doing so, Alan takes a slow step back. He does not know, or even recognize, the boy. After telling him that he is mistaken, Alan turns to leave and the young boy, who has said his name is Jerry, reaches out and touches Alan’s arm.
Even though the fabric of his coat, Alan finds Jerry’s touch repugnant.
And so Barbara Owens’ unsettling short story The New Man begins. First published in the March 1982 issue of Twilight Zone Magazine, The New Man was also adapted for the direct-to-syndication anthology series Tales from the Darkside.
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 29, 1983 |
Yeah, that happens.
I also recognized Norman Burton, who plays a well-meaning psychiatrist, from his small role in 1974's The Towering Inferno. LaWanda Page, best known to me for playing Aunt Esther on Sanford & Son, shows up for a cameo. Maybe she owed somebody a favor, or lost a bet, or something.
This is Ed Wood level exploitation cheese that few will find entertaining and most an unpleasant and amateurish chore to sit though. One viewing of it was enough for me, it seems.
I checked the listing for the Roxie and discovered it was part of a banger of a triple-bill. For one ticket you Mausoleum, Funeral Home, and The Gates of Hell. Although the paper misprinted Funeral as General.
![]() |
| Oops. |
The Parkway had it paired with just The Gates of Hell, while the Four Star was showing it alongside... E. T.!?!
![]() |
| WTAF!?! |
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 28, 1971 |
For whatever reason, most likely the cast including a young Bruce Dern as well as radio and voice actor icon Casey Kasem, The Incredible 2-Headed Transplant seemed a syndication station broadcast workhorse. I know it aired a few times on KTVU's Saturday afternoon Chiller Diller and late night Creature Features programs, as well as KBHK's Saturday afternoon Monstrous Movie. Making it one of the "those" movies I remember as always being on one station or the other with some degree of regularity.
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1400 Hours, Day 2 |
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 27, 1990 |
Because The Guardian stinks. It is a movie that serves as a great of example of "just because I suspend my disbelief does not mean you can insult my intelligence." I walked out of an opening day matinee screening mad as hell at this movie. I hated it.
When it came out on home video I think I gave it a second chance. At least I have a fuzzy memory of giving it second chance. Or maybe I just want to see the scene where the tree kills a trio of miscreants.
No matter, though. It still stunk and was just as insulting to the intelligence as when I sat through it at the Kabuki Theatre in San Francisco, on April 27, 1990.
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 24, 1975 |
While I do not remember seeing either of these particular editions on bookstore shelves, or nestled in drugstore spinner racks, I do remember picking up one for The Swarm in a used bookstore in Berkeley, way, way back in the day.
The two editions I remember, and actually read, were the movie tie-ins.
In 1976 I was equal parts fascinated and frightened by the black and white stills in the center of the Carrie tie-in. My interest was fueled somewhat by John Travolta being in it. Because he was one of the beloved Sweat Hogs in the popular sitcom Welcome Back, Kotter.
While I did read Carrie, two or three times, it might not have been until 1979, or maybe even 1980. It was long after I had seen the film's broadcast debut on network television. Which was the first time that I saw it.
The Swarm, which I was obsessed with in the first half of 1978, was my "birthday movie" for that year. Like a great many books at that time, I struggled to get through it. It would not be until 1980 or 81 that I would actually manage to read the entire book, from start to finish.
While not a great book, The Swarm could have made for a pretty good movie. If the person making said movie had understood the kind of movie they were making. Which had not been the case with Irwin Allen. So it goes.
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 23, 1981 |
Having done that, I thought it might be cool to track down one of the TV spots I remember seeing on television. I know that it featured Andrew (Stefan Arngrim), a birthday cake, and Andrew's father screaming "My son is the devil!"
This appears to be the one.
I feel the need to qualify this with the phrase "appears to be" as April 1981, at time of writing, is a whopping 45 years in my past. While the ad does feature what I remember, watching it did not trigger the dopamine hit response of, "Ah, that's the one! That's it!"
But it has been 45 years, man. That means a whole lot of memories smashing, mixing, or blending together. I think that it lodged in my memory at all is something of pop culture win.
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 22, 1979 |
I don't think it has ever been out of print.
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 21, 1976 |
This might be my favorite one of the entire run, though. It is just a rock solid 'little movie' that works and is well worth seeking out.
"I didn't know Dino, but I knew Dino. I'd grown up knowing Italian men cut from the same mold - expressive, warm, clever old guys, with just a hint of scoundrel underneath. My kind of people."
Telling because, after inhaling his fast-paced and breezy narrated autobiography, I have zero doubt that quite a few people would describe the gleefully indefatigable and unstoppable Charles Band the same way.
Because while he presents himself as being warm, expressive, and clever, Band also glistens with the sometimes alluring, sometimes off-putting, snake oil sheen of a true huckster. One that is self-aware of his many and considerable faults, but also bubbles with an infectious and delightful energy about what he has done and, for both better and worse, accomplished.
Charles Band loves what he does and, truth be told, that he has managed to land on his feet, even with the occasional shirt losing or arrest warrant inducing obstacle, and keep making multiple movies year in and year out for decades. Well, that is an impressive feat in and of itself.
In the early 90s I took to describing Charles Band as "an amalgamation of Roger Corman, Stan Lee, and George Lucas." An instinctual observation proven true while reading this bright and breezy book. Band has the unapologetic exploitation film production mindset of Corman, the four-color and cartoonish imagination of Lee, and the merchandising instincts of Lucas.
What Band lacks in ability, be it artistic or financial, he more than compensates for with exuberant tenacity. Something this brisk and breezy 275 page read illustrates with gusto. To this day Charles Band seems incapable of slowing down or resting on the laurels of his b-movie legacy. Because there is always some new gimmick or concept to exploit and explore.
So I tip my hat, raise a glass, and fervently hope that the Puppetmaster's Full Moon Empire might lasts just a tad longer. While some may grumble and bemoan Band and his output. I think the entertainment world and film industry is brighter and more interesting place because his glorious and oddball output.
Read and enjoy these Confessions of a Puppetmaster.
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 20, 1984 |
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1100 Hours, Day 2 |
This still image looks to be from the end of film, when the xenomporh is lured into the smelter. At least I think it was a smelter. They doused it with molten ore or metal in order to kill it, so I am guessing it was a smelter.
Wonder what the producers, or studio, thought when the very same thing was done to the dueling Terminators in Terminator 2: Judgment Day, which hit theaters and drive-ins the year or less before Alien 3 was slated to be released.
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 17, 1980 |
But it all started here, with an attention grabbing snarl of dystopian angst.
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 15, 2005 |
I gave The Amityville Horror a pass when it came out, as nothing about it seemed all that different or even interesting. Make Stephen Kaplan's self-published, entertaining and fascinating The Amityville Horror Conspiracy into a movie and, well, I would gladly pay to watch that.
![]() |
| An American Werewolf in London (1981) |
It was restored, though, after I made an appeal.
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1000, Day 2 |
An iconic image was so powerful it became a centerpiece of the ad campaign and, most likely, one the most memorable moments of the film. The above card text does a little bit of misdirection, though. I do not remember the character of Galic saying anything. The xenomorph just senses, or smells, the embryonic queen gestating inside Ripley and knows not to harm her. So it just leaves...
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 13, 1978 |
While the movie held my interest well enough, and I remember thinking it did not seem as bad or as boring as the scathing reviews and word of mouth I recall hearing in 1978 saying, the undisputed highlights were Burton's telekinetic attacks.
I also thought the ending was really, really cool.
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 10, 1980 |
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1000 Hours, Day 2 |
![]() |
| A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987) |
Having shared this factoid, it comes as a surprise to no one that this sequence is one of my all time favorites of the entire series.
Six hundred pages and still no explanation as to how a dead rat turned up in the most sterile section of the module? Come on!
While the lack of a reason, or explanation, being given for what was a running gag between my best friend and I was disappointing on a personal amusement level, it was not all that surprising from a creative standpoint. In his introduction to this comically massive doorstopper of a novelization of Bruno Mattei’s Hell of the Living Dead, Brad Carter explains he is adapting the original concept as drafted by the husband-wife creative team of Claudio Fragasso and the late Rossella Drudi.
What Fragasso and Drudi had envisioned was a large scale cannibal apocalypse that, truth be told, might rival the unmade “Raiders of the Lost Ark with zombies” version of Day of the Dead that George A. Romero had hoped to make.
But, just as what happened with Romero’s costly first pass plans for Day of the Dead, budgetary restrictions would force Fragasso and Drudi’s concept to be whittled down to its barest, most cost effective of bones.
Those bones would be handed over to the low budget maestro Bruno Mattei, who, in the grand tradition of Edward D. Wood Jr, utilized mismatching stock footage from a couple of mondo documentaries to give his movie some sense of having a larger scale than its paltry budget was incapable of delivering.
Character development and exploration was kept to a non-existent minimum and almost all of the political commentary regarding how the industrialized world cannibalizes the third world, robbing it of it resources while also preventing its peoples from becoming independent and self-reliant, was likewise jettisoned.
The result was a cheap and shoddy exploitation flick that still manages to be entertaining. Only not in the manner intended by its creators.
I first learned about the film now best known as Hell of the Living Dead when it was reviewed in the pages of Fangoria magazine, in a tongue-in-cheek (and short-lived) column titled Zombie of the Month. Because, when the film was released in the United States, as Night of the Zombies, it seemed that there was a ‘new’ gut munching zombie movie being unleashed in theaters and drive-ins every month.
I did not see Night of the Zombies until well after its release on home video and, I think, I watched it all of two times, maybe. While my memory of certain moments were quite vivid, I was not all that inclined to revisit the film prior to cracking open Carter’s “epic” adaptation.
Doing so turned out to be a wise thing, because, as Carter notes in his afterword, this book departs from its source material “in just about every way.” While all of the significant story beats and scenarios remain, they have also been re-contextualized, or outright changed, to better serve a far larger and a tad more convoluted storyline.
Which also allows for some robust and biting (no pun intended) political commentary.
Commentary that is in no way subtle and is every bit as on the nose as the commentary in any of Romero’s zombie epics, or in the preachier episodes of any and all variations of Star Trek. Which only made it all that more endearing to me, because there was obvious heartfelt thought put into the book’s just as obvious political and social commentary.
Some of that commentary echoes, or at least reminded me off, observations made by Paul Farmer in his book Fevers, Feuds, and Diamonds: Ebola and the Ravages of History.
A lot of the zombie action set pieces, as well as their evolving behaviors and intelligence, echo, or flat out repurpose, ideas and moments from Dawn of the Dead, Day of the Dead, and Land of the Dead. I also spotted a few similarities to Resident Evil (both games and movies) as well as David Cronenberg’s zombie-adjacent thrillers Shivers and Rabid, to name just a few. There is even a healthy smattering of Stephen King's The Stand sprinkled over it all.
Which only made the book all the more fun to read. Because Carter knew what he was writing and why he was writing it. This reads just like the Italian exploitation movie it is based on, gleefully cribbing anything and everything it can to stuff into its sprawling narrative.
Carter also knows when it is best to be serious and when some tongue-in-cheek snark is needed to take the wind out of the narrative's nihilistic sails. A good example of the former is noting that the HOPE portion of Project HOPE is an acronym for Humanitarian Operations for Preserving Earth. Which reads and sounds feasible. But a giggle-snort inducing example of the latter is a political think tank organization calling itself the Foundation for American Reason and Truth. You know, F.A.R.T.
Also notable is how Carter puts in an effort to develop most of the primary characters, who come off as a lot more intelligent and interesting than they were in the movie, which was greatly appreciated.
What I did not appreciate was the frustrating to the point of being contempt inducing number of errors in the book. There were so many missing words and clumsy or repeated phrases (such as “she let herself into herself into the room,” or something to that effect) that I began to suspect the book had not been copy, or line, edited prior to publication. Considering its hefty price, around $25 to $30, I was annoyed and frustrated by the poor editorial oversight displayed here.
Yet, as frustrating as all that was, I still found myself really enjoying this over-the-top and truly epic return to conceptual form for what eventually turned into Hell of the Living Dead. I doubt any fan of the film itself, or fan of the zombie apocalypse genre in general, will finish this book feeling cheated, or all that disappointed.
So, if you want to read a big chonker of a book that is just a cheap and trashy movie at heart, but is also smart enough to keep you engaged for most of its almost 600 hundred pages, I suggest you give it a try.
Besides, any and all that have read this far will already have known if they want it to read it or not, before they even started reading this review. I hope you enjoy(ed) it as much as I did.
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 8, 1983 |
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1000 Hours, Day 2 |
![]() |
| Oakland Tribune - April 7, 1985 |
![]() |
| San Francisco Examiner - April 6, 1976 |
Those questions would be answered when, while living in Hong Kong, I was able to finally see the film, under its original title: Shivers. By this time I had seen both Scanners and Videodrome on the big screen, the former being my formal introduction to David Cronenberg, and Rabid on home video. I had also read the essay about Cronenberg by Martin Scorsese that had been published in Fangoria. So I knew what Shivers was all about.
Despite all that advance cultural and critical knowledge, I was still good and rattled by Shivers. It was cold, weird, and disturbing as only David Cronenberg seems capable of being. I loved it then and love it now.
![]() |
| Datalog: Approx. 0:1000 Hours, Day 2 |